OpenUI vs others

OpenUI vs json-render (Vercel), A2UI (Google), and CopilotKit OpenGenerativeUI.

Open-source Generative UI projects share a common goal: enabling agents to respond with interactive interfaces instead of only text. They differ in what the model generates, how applications control the available UI, and where the result can be rendered.

This page compares OpenUI with json-render, A2UI, and OpenGenerativeUI. These projects do not all solve the same part of the Generative UI stack, so the comparison focuses on their approach and intended use.

Generative UI frameworks

  • OpenUI uses a compact, line-based language designed for models to generate interfaces from registered components. Its runtime supports streamed rendering, application state, data access, and user interactions.

  • json-render uses streaming JSONL patches generated from a component catalog.

  • A2UI is a protocol for sending declarative interface descriptions from agents to client applications. The client maps those descriptions to trusted, platform-native components.

  • OpenGenerativeUI focuses on open-ended visual experiences built with CopilotKit. It supports registered React components and free-form HTML or SVG rendered inside sandboxed iframes.

Feature comparison

OpenUIjson-render (Vercel)A2UI (Google)CopilotKit OpenGenUI
Tokens1x3x3x4x
Latency (60 tok/s)4.9s14.2s14.2s~20s
StreamingYesYesYesPartial
Consistent outputYesYesYesNo
Design systemYesYesYesNo
ComponentsLibrary + customLibrary + customCustom onlyNone
Built-in data fetchingYesNoNoNo
Chat UI includedYesNoNoYes
Multi-platformWeb, mobile, emailWeb, mobile, PDF, email, videoWeb, iOS, AndroidWeb
Security riskMinimalMinimalMinimalMedium
LicenseMITApache 2.0Apache 2.0MIT

Choosing a framework

  • Data-driven chat UIs and dashboards → OpenUI
  • One UI across web, mobile, PDF and email → OpenUI
  • Multi-agent systems across iOS, Android, and web → OpenUI
  • Creative one-off visuals (animations, generative art) → CopilotKit OpenGenUI

On this page